Shostakovich String Quartets Nos 3, 7 and 8
Differing approaches to searing Shostakovich from these Austrian and Russian string quartets
View record and artist detailsRecord and Artist Details
Composer or Director: Dmitri Shostakovich
Genre:
Chamber
Label: Deutsche Grammophon
Magazine Review Date: 8/2006
Media Format: CD or Download
Media Runtime: 63
Mastering:
Stereo
DDD
Catalogue Number: 477 6146GH

Tracks:
Composition | Artist Credit |
---|---|
String Quartet No. 3 |
Dmitri Shostakovich, Composer
Dmitri Shostakovich, Composer Hagen Qt |
String Quartet No. 7 |
Dmitri Shostakovich, Composer
Dmitri Shostakovich, Composer Hagen Qt |
String Quartet No. 8 |
Dmitri Shostakovich, Composer
Dmitri Shostakovich, Composer Hagen Qt |
Author: kYlzrO1BaC7A
Twenty years ago Shostakovich quartet recordings came as integral sets or further accounts of the ubiquitous Eighth, so the dissemination of the cycle as a whole has been a positive development. And, as one might expect from Austrian and Russian musicians, these discs reveal marked differences in their approach to the music.
For the Hagen, the Third Quartet is tautly argued, pursuing a trajectory from playful disquiet to calm resignation in a decisive response to the composer’s equivocal Ninth Symphony. Notably slower only in the finale, the Kopelman align it with the wartime instrumental works that preceded it, bringing greater weight of tone and an expressive vehemence that makes heavy weather of the opening Allegretto – its headlong coda persuasively rendered by the Hagen as a springboard into the ambivalence of the intermezzo.
Here and in the febrile Scherzo, they elicit a keener response than the Kopelman, who yet plumb greater depths in the Adagio. Come the finale, however, and the Hagen control tension over its rondo design more intently: their searing intensity in the climax and pained evanescence at the close more affecting than the forced pathos of their colleagues.
The recorded sound plays its part in the ‘feel’ of these performances – clean and well focused for the Hagen, warmer in ambience for the Kopelman but with a degree of resonance that diffuses impact in the densest tuttis. Their more expansive approach to the central Lento succeeds on its own terms but the Hagen’s greater restraint works better in the overall context of Shostakovich’s most circumspect work for the medium. Here and in the Eighth Quartet they convey a more acute response than the lucid but often too detached Yggdrasil, though the implacability of the following Largo and the muted despair of the outer movements come across even more strongly with the Sorrel – the finest modern version.
The Nimbus disc concludes with a persuasive reading of Prokofiev’s Second Quartet, though the Chilingirians’ account (Chandos, 7/91) is scarcely less convincing and finds a greater finesse to broaden the expressive range of this deceptively unassuming work. A disc most likely to appeal to admirers of these musicians, then, whereas the Hagen is a worthy follow-up to their disc of Nos 4, 11, and 14 (DG, nla) in a cycle worth completing.
For the Hagen, the Third Quartet is tautly argued, pursuing a trajectory from playful disquiet to calm resignation in a decisive response to the composer’s equivocal Ninth Symphony. Notably slower only in the finale, the Kopelman align it with the wartime instrumental works that preceded it, bringing greater weight of tone and an expressive vehemence that makes heavy weather of the opening Allegretto – its headlong coda persuasively rendered by the Hagen as a springboard into the ambivalence of the intermezzo.
Here and in the febrile Scherzo, they elicit a keener response than the Kopelman, who yet plumb greater depths in the Adagio. Come the finale, however, and the Hagen control tension over its rondo design more intently: their searing intensity in the climax and pained evanescence at the close more affecting than the forced pathos of their colleagues.
The recorded sound plays its part in the ‘feel’ of these performances – clean and well focused for the Hagen, warmer in ambience for the Kopelman but with a degree of resonance that diffuses impact in the densest tuttis. Their more expansive approach to the central Lento succeeds on its own terms but the Hagen’s greater restraint works better in the overall context of Shostakovich’s most circumspect work for the medium. Here and in the Eighth Quartet they convey a more acute response than the lucid but often too detached Yggdrasil, though the implacability of the following Largo and the muted despair of the outer movements come across even more strongly with the Sorrel – the finest modern version.
The Nimbus disc concludes with a persuasive reading of Prokofiev’s Second Quartet, though the Chilingirians’ account (Chandos, 7/91) is scarcely less convincing and finds a greater finesse to broaden the expressive range of this deceptively unassuming work. A disc most likely to appeal to admirers of these musicians, then, whereas the Hagen is a worthy follow-up to their disc of Nos 4, 11, and 14 (DG, nla) in a cycle worth completing.
Discover the world's largest classical music catalogue with Presto Music.

Gramophone Digital Club
- Digital Edition
- Digital Archive
- Reviews Database
- Full website access
From £8.75 / month
Subscribe
Gramophone Full Club
- Print Edition
- Digital Edition
- Digital Archive
- Reviews Database
- Full website access
From £11.00 / month
Subscribe
If you are a library, university or other organisation that would be interested in an institutional subscription to Gramophone please click here for further information.