Rachmaninov; Shostakovich Piano Trios
This superb team have the full measure of these Russian trios
View record and artist detailsRecord and Artist Details
Composer or Director: Sergey Rachmaninov, Dmitri Shostakovich
Genre:
Chamber
Label: Warner Classics
Magazine Review Date: 4/2005
Media Format: CD or Download
Media Runtime: 79
Mastering:
Stereo
Catalogue Number: 2564 61937-2
Tracks:
Composition | Artist Credit |
---|---|
Trio élégiaque |
Sergey Rachmaninov, Composer
Alexander Kniazev, Cello Boris Berezovsky, Piano Dmitri Mahktin, Violin Sergey Rachmaninov, Composer |
Piano Trio No. 2 |
Dmitri Shostakovich, Composer
Alexander Kniazev, Cello Boris Berezovsky, Piano Dmitri Mahktin, Violin Dmitri Shostakovich, Composer |
Author: Harriet Smith
Rachmaninov’s only substantial piano trio remains a relative rarity in the catalogue. It’s not hard to see why, for this is more of an Ugly Sister than a Cinderella. True, there are many passages of beauty and poignancy, but overall it’s an oddly structured piece, with two substantial movements followed by an almost throwaway finale.
This new reading comes closer than most to concealing the work’s flaws. The opening movement is wonderfully realised, a single sweep of grief mingled with love and regret (it was written on the death of Tchaikovsky). And the second couldn’t be more musically played (just listen to the sparkling interplay from 7’12”). It’s a highly piano-centric work, but you never feel that Berezovsky is hogging the limelight, superbly matched as he is by his compatriots. By contrast, the finale, despite its portentous, Brahmsian opening, is over all too soon, as if Rachmaninov simply ran out of steam.
It’s tantalising that Rachmaninov left no recording of his own. But in the case of Shostakovich’s Second Trio, we have had the composer at the keyboard on two occasions (various labels). Comparison is salutary: most modern interpretations seem sluggish by comparison (though admittedly Shostakovich plays fast and loose with his own tempo indications), particularly in the finale. David Fanning found much to praise in a new version from the Wanderer Trio. To my mind, Berezovsky, Makhtin and Kniazev are even more satisfying; I prefer their slightly faster tempo for the Allegro con brio second movement, while their take on the following Passacaglia ideally balances profundity with unaffectedness. Their restraint is much more potent than the tacky exaggerations of Argerich, Kremer and Maisky, in a live performance from 1998.
Only a couple of niggles: like the Wanderer Trio, the string players apparently ignore the con sordino instruction in the finale (at 7’09”), and in the Passacaglia, at 1’54”, there’s a very prominent exhalation from one of them – bothersome enough to make one wonder why it was left in. The recording is warm and convincingly balanced and complements the superb performances.
This new reading comes closer than most to concealing the work’s flaws. The opening movement is wonderfully realised, a single sweep of grief mingled with love and regret (it was written on the death of Tchaikovsky). And the second couldn’t be more musically played (just listen to the sparkling interplay from 7’12”). It’s a highly piano-centric work, but you never feel that Berezovsky is hogging the limelight, superbly matched as he is by his compatriots. By contrast, the finale, despite its portentous, Brahmsian opening, is over all too soon, as if Rachmaninov simply ran out of steam.
It’s tantalising that Rachmaninov left no recording of his own. But in the case of Shostakovich’s Second Trio, we have had the composer at the keyboard on two occasions (various labels). Comparison is salutary: most modern interpretations seem sluggish by comparison (though admittedly Shostakovich plays fast and loose with his own tempo indications), particularly in the finale. David Fanning found much to praise in a new version from the Wanderer Trio. To my mind, Berezovsky, Makhtin and Kniazev are even more satisfying; I prefer their slightly faster tempo for the Allegro con brio second movement, while their take on the following Passacaglia ideally balances profundity with unaffectedness. Their restraint is much more potent than the tacky exaggerations of Argerich, Kremer and Maisky, in a live performance from 1998.
Only a couple of niggles: like the Wanderer Trio, the string players apparently ignore the con sordino instruction in the finale (at 7’09”), and in the Passacaglia, at 1’54”, there’s a very prominent exhalation from one of them – bothersome enough to make one wonder why it was left in. The recording is warm and convincingly balanced and complements the superb performances.
Discover the world's largest classical music catalogue with Presto Music.
Gramophone Digital Club
- Digital Edition
- Digital Archive
- Reviews Database
- Full website access
From £8.75 / month
SubscribeGramophone Full Club
- Print Edition
- Digital Edition
- Digital Archive
- Reviews Database
- Full website access
From £11.00 / month
Subscribe
If you are a library, university or other organisation that would be interested in an institutional subscription to Gramophone please click here for further information.