Martinú Suite Concertante
Sprightly performances – but the music fails to enchant as it might
View record and artist detailsRecord and Artist Details
Composer or Director: Bohuslav (Jan) Martinu
Genre:
Orchestral
Label: Supraphon
Magazine Review Date: 12/2002
Media Format: CD or Download
Media Runtime: 48
Mastering:
Stereo
DDD
Catalogue Number: SU3653-2
Tracks:
Composition | Artist Credit |
---|---|
Concerto for Violin and Orchestra No. 1 |
Bohuslav (Jan) Martinu, Composer
Bohuslav (Jan) Martinu, Composer Bohuslav Matousek, Violin Christopher Hogwood, Conductor Czech Philharmonic Orchestra |
Suite Concertante |
Bohuslav (Jan) Martinu, Composer
Bohuslav (Jan) Martinu, Composer Bohuslav Matousek, Violin Christopher Hogwood, Conductor Czech Philharmonic Orchestra |
Author: DuncanDruce
It was Samuel Dushkin, the violinist for whom Stravinsky wrote his Concerto and Duo Concertant, who commissioned these two works. The First Violin Concerto, dating from 1932-33, evidently didn’t please Dushkin; after getting the composer to make revisions, he still didn’t perform the work, which only saw the light of day after Martinu’s death when it was premièred in 1973 by Josef Suk. Despite all this, Dushkin had come back to Martinu a few years later with a request for a suite for violin and orchestra, and this time he didn’t spurn the result.
I can’t say I’m bowled over by either piece. Though Martinu writes extremely idiomatically for the violin, I find those movements where he adopts an energetic neo-classical mode – the Suite’s opening Toccata, and the Concerto’s first movement – dry and unappealing. The two slow movements, with their rather pale echoes of the Czech pastoral idiom, are somewhat more enjoyable, and the more dance-like movements, such as the Suite’s Rondo finale, are certainly quite compelling; in these pieces the characteristic sonorous and rhythmic quality of the Czech Philharmonic really comes into its own.
Throughout, Matousek is a neat, lively, sweet-toned soloist, with Hogwood directing an alert, poised accompaniment. In the Suite’s slightly grotesque Scherzo, however, I began to wonder what a violinist with the personality of a Heifetz or a Szigeti might have made of the music.
I can’t say I’m bowled over by either piece. Though Martinu writes extremely idiomatically for the violin, I find those movements where he adopts an energetic neo-classical mode – the Suite’s opening Toccata, and the Concerto’s first movement – dry and unappealing. The two slow movements, with their rather pale echoes of the Czech pastoral idiom, are somewhat more enjoyable, and the more dance-like movements, such as the Suite’s Rondo finale, are certainly quite compelling; in these pieces the characteristic sonorous and rhythmic quality of the Czech Philharmonic really comes into its own.
Throughout, Matousek is a neat, lively, sweet-toned soloist, with Hogwood directing an alert, poised accompaniment. In the Suite’s slightly grotesque Scherzo, however, I began to wonder what a violinist with the personality of a Heifetz or a Szigeti might have made of the music.
Discover the world's largest classical music catalogue with Presto Music.
Gramophone Digital Club
- Digital Edition
- Digital Archive
- Reviews Database
- Full website access
From £8.75 / month
SubscribeGramophone Full Club
- Print Edition
- Digital Edition
- Digital Archive
- Reviews Database
- Full website access
From £11.00 / month
Subscribe
If you are a library, university or other organisation that would be interested in an institutional subscription to Gramophone please click here for further information.